I've also linked some useful sites that contain some more indepth discussions.
General Windows Changes
- Native NIC Teaming
- SMB 3.0
- Ability to switch between Server Core and Full UI
- Multi Server Management from Server Manager
- Metro interface (present, but not in your face at boot)
- Storage Spaces
- Everything doable in the UI can be done with PowerShell
Infrastructure Changes
- Domain Controller Replication (Clone & Deploy a DC)
- Virtual Domain Controller Support
- Storage across Remote SMB 3.0 File Shares (SQL & VM's run from file shares)
- IP Address Management
- Dynamic Access Control (File & Folder permissions on steriods!)
- RemoteFX without a hardware GPU
- RemoteFX in RDS Sessions, not just VDI
Hyper-V Changes
- Shared Nothing Live Migration
- Live Storage Migration
- Multiple Concurrent Live Migrations
- Hyper-V Replica
- Extensible Virtual Switch
- SR-IOV
- Network Virtualisation (servers running on the same IP without conflict)
Hyper-V Scalability Changes
- 160 Logical Processors per Host
- 2Tb RAM per Host
- 32 vCPUs per VM
- 512Gb per VM
- 16Tb VHDx
- 63 Nodes per Cluster
- 4,000 VMs per Cluster
Hyper-V 3.0 versus vSphere 5
While comparing an unreleased product to a released product isn't exactly fair, I thought I'd include it for completeness sake. Also it's the most common question that customers ask me.
This article has a fairly clear comparison table:
http://up2v.nl/2012/01/29/microsoft-hyper-v-3-0-compared-to-vmware-vsphere-5/
Information Links
http://www.aidanfinn.com/ - Massive resource for Hyper-V
http://workinghardinit.wordpress.com/ - Another huge Hyper-V resource
http://blogs.technet.com/b/server-cloud/archive/2011/10/11/windows-server-8-hyper-v-overview.aspx
http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/server-cloud/
2 comments:
The effectiveness of IEEE Project Domains depends very much on the situation in which they are applied. In order to further improve IEEE Final Year Project Domains practices we need to explicitly describe and utilise our knowledge about software domains of software engineering Final Year Project Domains for CSE technologies. This paper suggests a modelling formalism for supporting systematic reuse of software engineering technologies during planning of software projects and improvement programmes in Final Year Project Centers in Chennai.
Software management seeks for decision support to identify technologies like JavaScript that meet best the goals and characteristics of a software project or improvement programme. JavaScript Training in Chennai Accessible experiences and repositories that effectively guide that technology selection are still lacking.
Aim of technology domain analysis is to describe the class of context situations (e.g., kinds of JavaScript software projects) in which a software engineering technology JavaScript Training in Chennai can be applied successfully
Thank you soo much for the great and nice Information about Windows Server! this is very useful information for me.
Germany VPS Server
Post a Comment